iv
AN APPRECIATION
Cunningham's book, that policy v/as undoubtedly unCunningham's book would be widely read, and
That an officer
would influence the general verdict.
holding a high political office should write a book
which, by the facts disclosed in it, reflected, however
indirectly, t>n his Dalhousie's policy, was not to be endured. With one stroke of the pen, then, he removed
Cunningham from his appointment at Bhopal. Cunningham, stunned by the blow, entirely unexpected,
died of a broken heart!"
just.
.
.
.
Truth, however, has triumphed ultimately as it
has a way of doing. Lord Dalhousie could crush Cunningham, but he could not crush his work. Posterity
hastened not only to remove from the brow of this
conscientious and faithful historian the scars of the
stigma which Dalhousie had tried l.o brand on it, but
also to adorn it with the laurel crown which is the
Cunningham's place in the
victor's just reward.
Valhalla of historians is now secure.