AUTHOR'S PREFACE TO 2ND EDITION
xxi
constantly endeavoured to keep his readers alive to
that undercurrent of feeling or principle which moves
the Sikh people collectively, and which will usually
rise superior to the crimes or follies of individuals. It
was the history of Sikhs,^ a new and peculiar nation,
which he wished to make known to strangers; and he
saw no reason for continually recurring to the duty
or destiny of the English in India, because he was
addressing himself to his own countrymen who know
the merits aid motives of their supremacy in the East,
and who can themselves commonly decide whether the
particular acts of a viceroy are in accordance with the
general policy of his government. The Sikhs, moreover, are so inferior to the English in resources and
knowledge that there is no equality of comparison
between them.
The glory to England is indeed great of her Eastern
Dominion, and she may justly feel proud of the increasing excellence of her sway over subject nations;
but this general expression of the sense and desire of
the English people does not show that every proceeding of her delegates is necessarily fitting and far-seeing.
The wisdom of England is not to be measured by the
views and acts of any one of her sons, but is rather to
be deduced from the characters of many. In India it
is to be gathered in part from the high, but not always
scrupulous, qualities which distinguished Clive, Hastings, and Wellesley, who acquired and secured the
Empire; in part from the generous, but not always
discerning, sympathies of Burke, Cornwallis, and Bentinck, who gave to English rule the stamp of moderation and humanity; and also in part from the ignorant
well-meaning of the people at large, who justly deprecating ambition in the abstract vainly strive to check
the progress of conquest before its necessary limits
have been attained, and before the aspiring energies of
the conquerors themselves have become exhausted. By
conquest, I would be understood to imply the extension
of supremacy, and not the extinction of dynasties, for
such imperial form of do'mination should be the aim
and scope of English sway in the East. England should
reign over kings rather than rule over subjects.
The Sikhs and the English are each irresistibly
urged forward in their different ways and degrees towards remote and perhaps diverse ends the Sikhs, as
the leaders of a congenial mental change; the English,
as the promoters of rational law and material wealth;
and individual chiefs and rulers can merely play their
: